China’s trade goals increase Trump’s policies

China’s trade goals increase Trump’s policies

China’s trade goals increase Trump’s policies
April 18
13:56 2017
Matthew Li | Staff Writer

President Donald Trump’s isolationist policies are advantageous for a China on the rise. By minimizing U.S. international influence, Trump is leaving open an economic power void that could easily be filled by any other country.

Ever since Trump took office, Chinese President Xi Jing Ping began to paint China as a globally oriented community. Chinese media is underlining China’s role in the global scene and portraying itself as a world power capable of spreading its influence to all corners of the world.

The way that things are happening now, China is antithetical to America. While Trump prepares to cut funds for the Environmental Protection Agency, President Xi vigorously defended the Paris Agreement on curbing greenhouse gas emissions. When Trump left the Trans-Pacific Partnership, China began to propose its own trade organization that would allow it to retain power in the Pacific.

Everything Trump does, China has an answer. This type of tit-for-tat game that China plays has allowed it to gradually spread its tendrils into the depths of the entire world. Even the 45 percent tariffs that Trump has proposed on Chinese imports would hurt U.S. consumers more than Chinese exporters.

Trump’s past accusations of China being a “currency manipulator” might have a grain of truth. For a country with a cheaply valued currency, it can subsidize its exports easily and therefore be able to get more bang for its buck when exporting to foreign countries. Since the Chinese government has complete control over its state-run banks, it can easily change the value of its currency. By limiting the amount of foreign investment, and by changing the amount of liquidity in state-run banks, the exchange rate of yuan can easily be manipulated.

By keeping exchange rates low, it can consistently collect money through its taxes on exports. This money is then used on military excursions in the Philippines that also allow it to pressure the U.S. into giving it more favorable terms. The U.S., in turn, has also held the threat of investigating China directly for being a “currency manipulator,” which would lead to possible sanctions by the international community in exchange for its cooperation in dealing with North Korea.

On April 15 the Treasury Department presented to Congress a report on its major trading partners, and informed them that China has not been deemed a “currency manipulator.”

Will Trump really go after China? He has stated that China’s currency manipulation is a huge problem to the U.S. economy, but now that the U.S. and China have to work together to babysit North Korea, his opinions seemed to have been muted. Trump is right that now is not the time to call out our allies, but he didn’t seem too eager to report them in the first place.
Most likely, China will let its yuan value fluctuate minutely to the ebbs and flows of the market without any outside influence, and Trump will not start too many fights with them. Until the North Korea stops launching missiles, there will likely be a peaceful tension between these two superpowers.
Featured Illustration: Samuel Wiggins

About Author

Preston Mitchell

Preston Mitchell

A fan of pop culture, Preston loves everything from political think pieces to action blockbusters. He is also the Opinion Editor of the NT Daily and an Integrative Studies senior at UNT.

Related Articles

0 Comments

No Comments Yet!

There are no comments at the moment, do you want to add one?

Write a comment

Write a Comment

Twitter Feed

North Texas Daily @ntdaily
While some might argue against graffiti, it is much more than just spray paint and blank walls for local artists.… https://t.co/1WvDTCoD7q
h J R
North Texas Daily @ntdaily
RT @kellythefox1: I wrote my first review for the NT Daily! | The Dose: ‘Melodrama’ is the Lorde we’ve been waiting for https://t.co/HlQaPT
h J R
North Texas Daily @ntdaily
Think feminists can't listen to rap? Think again. (column) https://t.co/gBVZpbY1a3 https://t.co/Q5jMXJJ00l
h J R
North Texas Daily @ntdaily
RT @ReeceWaddell15: This means subsidies and student service fees made up the ~$21M difference.Problem isn't just at UNT. Only UT and A&M…
h J R
North Texas Daily @ntdaily
RT @ReeceWaddell15: New report by @TexasTribune shows #UNT's athletic expenses in 2015-2016 were ~$34M.Their revenue, minus subsidies was…
h J R

Facebook Feed

NTDAILY TV