Letter to the Editor: All for campus carry

Letter to the Editor: All for campus carry

February 10
00:28 2015

Most arguments against legalizing campus carry in Texas  hinge on the belief that college campuses are unique environments requiring unique rules. Opponents explain why a trained, licensed, carefully screened adult (age 21 or above) who regularly and without incident carries a concealed handgun at a municipal library, a private health club and a Luby’s Cafeteria would do immeasurable harm by carrying the same concealed handgun at a university library, a student recreation center or cafeteria. Nineteen years of Texas Department of Public Safety statistics demonstrate empirically that licensed concealed carry presents no threat to the rest of the state; therefore, opponents argue that campuses are fundamentally different from the rest of the state.

The most basic form of this argument conflates college campuses with stereotypical depictions of college life. Using hyperbolic language that more accurately describes a National Lampoon film than any actual institution of higher education, opponents make terrifying predictions about the dangers of mixing guns and alcohol. Not surprisingly, these predictions ignore the fact that the alcohol-centric activities often associated with college life take place almost exclusively off-campus and are seldom, if ever, found in lecture halls, libraries or cafeterias—the places impacted by campus gun bans. Neither Senate Bill 11 nor House Bill 937, two campus carry bills pending before the Texas Legislature, would change the laws at fraternity houses, bars, tailgating events or off-campus parties—the places where students (particularly those old enough to obtain a concealed handgun license) are most likely to drink. Both SB 11 and HB 937 would allow colleges to regulate the storage of firearms in dorms.

Purveyors of the colleges-are-different myth argue that students are simply too young, naïve and emotionally immature to carry firearms. While many collegians, particularly military veterans and other nontraditional students, have good reason to take issue with that assessment, a discussion about the maturity of college students is nothing but a distraction. The debate over campus carry is not about who can carry a gun; it’s about where CHL holders can carry guns. The individuals who would be allowed to carry guns on campuses are the same trained, tested, vetted and licensed adults who currently carry guns at movie theaters, shopping malls, churches, grocery stores, restaurants, banks and the Texas Capitol.

Another focus of the anywhere-but-colleges line is that law enforcement officers responding to a report of an active shooter on campus would be unable to differentiate the armed good guys from the armed bad guys. To understand why this isn’t a problem anywhere else licensed concealed carry is allowed and why it wouldn’t be a problem on college campuses, one must look at the laws governing concealed carry and the physics governing real-world shootouts. CHL holders are prohibited from drawing their weapons until and unless they encounter an imminent threat. Neither the sound of gunshots in the distance nor a text message from a campus alert system constitutes an imminent threat. They’re trained to move away from danger and not attempt to interdict a crime that doesn’t involve them. Given that, according to experts, most gunfights last only about three seconds, the odds of police encountering either gun-wielding students or an ongoing shootout are extremely low.

Campus carry is not an unproven concept. Outside of Texas, more than 150 U.S. college campuses have allowed it for a combined total of almost 1,500 semesters without a single resulting assault or suicide. Licensed concealed carry is just as safe and effective on college campuses as anywhere else. Why should Texas maintain honor-system-based laws and policies that stack the odds in favor of any violent criminal or homicidal maniac willing to disregard state law and school policy?

Madison D. Welch, a December 2014 graduate of Texas A&M University, serves as the southwest regional director for Students for Concealed Carry

About Author

Reporter

Reporter

Related Articles

0 Comments

No Comments Yet!

There are no comments at the moment, do you want to add one?

Write a comment

Write a Comment

Twitter Feed

North Texas Daily @ntdaily
RT @kellythefox1: I wrote my first review for the NT Daily! | The Dose: ‘Melodrama’ is the Lorde we’ve been waiting for https://t.co/HlQaPT
h J R
North Texas Daily @ntdaily
Think feminists can't listen to rap? Think again. (column) https://t.co/gBVZpbY1a3 https://t.co/Q5jMXJJ00l
h J R
North Texas Daily @ntdaily
RT @ReeceWaddell15: This means subsidies and student service fees made up the ~$21M difference.Problem isn't just at UNT. Only UT and A&M…
h J R
North Texas Daily @ntdaily
RT @ReeceWaddell15: New report by @TexasTribune shows #UNT's athletic expenses in 2015-2016 were ~$34M.Their revenue, minus subsidies was…
h J R
North Texas Daily @ntdaily
UNT professor's study finds that bystanders are affected by workplace bullying, too. https://t.co/uiKK60UYFa https://t.co/wViFbKzsBJ
h J R

Facebook Feed

NTDAILY TV